Malcolm Turnbull has passed his first test as a national security leader after the shocking terrorist murder outside the police centre at Sydney’s Parramatta.
The essence of Turnbull’s wisdom here has been balance.
He has said essentially three things. The first, this is a shocking, cold-blooded murder and our thoughts and prayers are with the victim’s family and the NSW Police Service.
Second, this is an act of terrorism.
Third, no one should attribute guilt by association for this terrible act to the Muslim community or to any other Muslims individually. The need for dialogue with the Muslim community is not only to maintain social cohesion but also to help in efforts to counter the radicalisation of young people. Each element of these messages was necessary. To miss any one would have been to unbalance the response.
Turnbull’s response has won appreciation and support from each of the relevant audiences: the public generally, NSW police, security agencies and leaders of Muslim communities.
Turnbull’s government signalled in its earliest days that it was going to change the tone of the rhetoric it used in relation to terrorism.
No one could doubt Tony Abbott’s abundant goodwill in this area, but his rhetoric had become a little clunky, the constant repetition of the phrase “the death cult” was off-putting and some Muslim community leaders felt he had been a bit rough with them, in particular
in his remark he wished more Muslim leaders would say Islam was a religion of peace and mean it.
in his remark he wished more Muslim leaders would say Islam was a religion of peace and mean it.
In any event, numbers of otherwise moderate and mainstream Muslim leaders felt alienated and some degree of co-operation had declined.
National security agency leaders are at one in thinking that a warm embrace of the Muslim community, which is overwhelmingly law-abiding, was necessary in principle and also for effective counter-terrorist work.
The relevant parliamentary secretary, Connie Fierravanti-Wells, told this newspaper that many Muslims felt alienated from the government’s approach.
Turnbull has an opportunity therefore to reset the tone of the government’s interaction with community leaders in Australia. This cannot come at the expense of going soft on terrorism.
If Turnbull was going to make a mistake, it would have been in not wanting to classify this hideous event as terrorism. But as NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione remarked, this was violence with a political motivation and therefore it was terrorism. That Turnbull had no hesitation in calling this killing was very important.
Some in the government were privately uncertain whether it had been wise to label even the Sydney Lindt cafe killings as terrorism, because the perpetrator was clearly unbalanced and had acted without direct contact with Islamic State, yet many terrorists around the world are unbalanced, he had used ISIS iconography in the attack and Islamic State had called directly for such unprovoked attacks.
For all that the response to the Parramatta shootings has been swift, effective and assured, and well co-ordinated between state and federal law enforcement agencies and political leaders, this is a terrible moment for Australia.
Not only has an innocent husband and father been killed, but this is now the third fatal terrorist incident in Australia in a short period of time. Apart from the Lindt cafe killings, there was Numan Haider’s attack on Victoria Police in which the assailant was killed, and now the Parramatta shooting.
Our intelligence and police agencies do a fine job in keeping Australians safe. Co-operation with the Muslim community itself is a central part of that, but our political leaders must also answer critical questions: are the resources adequate to tackle the problem, are the agencies as co-ordinated and as effective as possible, are the laws adequate to deal with the problem, and do the political leaders provide that necessary combination of steely resolve, calm reassurance and community outreach.
In this first tragic test, Turnbull has done well. Sadly, it is unlikely to be his last such test.